Fracking is bad for your health

Fracking is bad for the environment. Stop hydraulic fracturing

The question to answer here is whether fracking is bad for the natural environment.

We will find out what the definition of ‘fracking’ is and take a look at whether the evidence supports this claim, but first I want to express my experience living in the State of Pennsylvania.

I’ve lived in the State of Pennsylvania for about four years now, and overall Pennsylvania is a very beautiful state.

Pennsylvania has beautiful landscapes such as its parks, lakes, and mountain areas.

With that being said, I happened to be on the internet and I saw, in a local, online newspaper, that Governor Tom Corbett approved what is called “fracking” on some college campuses in the state.

Upon further research, I found out that fracking is a type of hydraulic fracturing or drilling that is conducted to collect natural gas that’s deep under the ground.

Fracking may help big companies increase their profits, but it appears to be at the expense of the natural environment, particularly in areas of the general public. The populous understanding is that fracking is bad for the natural environment and the people who live in it.

Let’s take look at some of the grievances in regards to the ‘fracking’ phenomenon.

Mother Jones reported on October 12th that Governor Corbett of Pennsylvania “signed into law a bill that opens up 14 of the state’s public universities to fracking, oil drilling, and coal mining on campus.”

Mother Jones also reported that “environmentalists and educators are concerned that fracking and other resource exploitation on campus could leave students directly exposed to harms like explosions, water contamination, and air pollution. They’re also worried oil and gas development would leave campuses ruined for future generations.”

On November 3, 2012, Buzzflash.com posted a commentary on a statement that actor and activist Mark Ruffalo released, in response to accusations that the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) had been “fraudulently manipulating lab results of residents whose water had been tested for possible contamination by fracking.”

Mark Ruffalo:

“It seems that what so many of us have suspected is proving to be true. The Pennsylvania’s DEP has been playing fast and loose with scientific evidence and in the process has endangered the health and well being of the citizens it is supposed to protect. A full federal investigation should be opened to see the extent of the agency’s corruption and negligence. It is my hope that the victims of fracking, from Washington County to Dimock Township, who have been demonized for fighting to protect their families’ clean water, will be exonerated.”

Fracking has also disturbed generational family farming.

On February 1, 2013, the Pulitzer Center published an article, written by Dimiter Kenarov,  about an interview he conducted on a seventh-generation farmer (Sheila Russell) that works on her family farm in Bradford County, Pennsylvania.

Kenarov wrote:

“As it happened, Sheila’s farm was sitting right on top of the Marcellus Shale, an ancient seabed running under large swaths of northern and western Pennsylvania, and rich in shale gas. Since 2007, the region has become the center of a real fossil-fuel rush, with hundreds of companies from all around the world descending onto the countryside.”

“About 9,000 wells have been drilled thus far, with tens of thousands more planned. Unlike conventional natural gas, however, which collects in large underground reservoirs, the commercial extraction of shale gas requires a highly invasive industrial process called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and a very large number of wells. A special mixture of up to seven million gallons of water, fine sand and chemicals, some toxic, is injected under high pressure underground in order to shatter the hard, impermeable shale rock and release any trapped gas inside.”

Ultimately, the Russell farm suffered the undue consequences.

“The cement casings of one of the gas wells on their property had failed almost immediately” and Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection noted it “in its violations report in March 2011.”

“After another DEP inspection in the summer of 2011, methane was still leaking from the well and “even though the issues were serious, the Russells, rightful owners of the property they had leased out, were not informed, and “it took nearly a year after the leaks had started before they found out the true extent of the situation.”

Not only were the Russells incensed but the gas well “was threatening to destroy their 216-year-old farm” and “with some of her neighbors already suffering health problems because of water contamination from drilling, Sheila [Russell] refused to take a gamble and stopped watering the crops from her local well, switching instead to a spring-fed pond at the edge of her property. As a health precaution, she and her family also ceased drinking from the tap and started buying plastic jugs of water from the store.”

The fracking industry contaminated the water supplies of 16 Bradford County families. Another case where profit overrides the concern for public health.

In a neighboring state, on the northeastern end of Pennsylvania, there is strong opposition to the fracking industry, and it is loud and clear.

The Catskill Mountainkeeper, the Advocate for the Catskills of New York, answered the question of “what’s wrong with fracking?” Their response is “almost everything.”

“Problems include:   Air Pollution; Threat to the Catskill Park; Threat to the Delaware River Basin; Increased incidence of Earthquakes; Threat to our Economy; Danger of toxic chemicals being spread by Flooding; Danger to our Food Supply; Severe Health ImpactsMortgage Problems; Threat to the Social Welfare of our communities; Toxic Wastewater and Water Contamination.”

Fracking is bad diametrically, as far as the Catskill Mountainkeeper is concerned, with stories to support their claims.

In conclusion, it seems that fracking has done much more harm than good, and fracking is bad in numerous ways. The stories put forth by residents and writers, who cover these environmental tragedies, make the case that we, as a nation, need to move towards alternative energy aggressively and decisively. Our government has allowed corporations to escape with minor penalties in compared to the damage that they do to the natural environments of the communities they affect.

Governors like Tom Corbett, as well as many other public officials, have opened the door to big companies to destroy nature, in return for tax revenue and campaign donations.

The public fight against this activity is not a superficial one. In the fight against government inclination to overlook or give leniency to drilling company violations, such as the PA DEP’s negligent inspections, and the lobbying of the companies themselves, the public is fighting for the health of their natural environment, as well as the personal safety of their families and loved ones.

Fracking is bad for the environment and there’s no two ways about it.

Firebrand Central

 

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

ACORN back in review; ACORN was destroyed unconstitutionally

ACORN

ACORN back in review

As many of  you have already heard, ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) was the community organizing group that was forced to dismantle, due to lack of funds for legal services, in defending the organization against close to 50 state, federal, and local investigations, but worst of all, the ‘Defund ACORN’ Act passed by Congress, and signed into law by President Obama.

The Defund ACORN Act was deemed an unconstitutional “Bill of Attainder.” 

Because of this erroneous act by Congress, ACORN was deemed ‘guilty’ without being convicted of any wrongdoing.

I’m sure many of you are saying, “What about the ACORN video by James O’Keefe with prostitution scandal?” It was later discovered that the videotape was heavily edited; in other words, O’Keefe’s sole purpose was to bring down ACORN with scandal, even if it was all based on a lie!! This is NOT ethical journalism nor should O’Keefe hypocritically speak about truth when he exemplified none in his feeble and bogus attempt to be an investigative reporter.

Here is an excerpt from a Huffington Post article by John Atlas:

“ACORN would have survived the presidential election attacks, but for videotapes of two right wing activists who entered ten of ACORN’s offices, allegedly posing as a pimp and a prostitute. The activists with the help of conservative entrepreneur Andrew Breitbart claimed that the videos proved that ACORN’s staff was incompetent and the group was promoting prostitution.”

“The videos were shown on Fox News and cable around the clock for weeks. Every media outlet picked up the story. When the mainstream media, including the New York Times, verified the Fox tapes as factual, most of ACORN’s financial and political supporters abandoned the group. Congress defunded ACORN, further stigmatizing the group. By the end of 2009, every independent investigation–including the Congressional Research Service, a former Massachusetts Attorney General, a Brooklyn District Attorney and the California Attorney General, exonerated ACORN from all wrong-doing. It turned out the videos were doctored, edited, and misleading. Over 45 federal, state, and local investigations cleared ACORN of wrongdoing, but two investigations–one in Pennsylvania and one in Nevada– continued to drain ACORN’s resources.”

“But the damage to ACORN was done — the group had to dismantle, though Bertha Lewis, ACORN’s CEO, hoped to have a small Washington D.C. presence to give voice to the poor.”

ACORN was also accused of engaging in voter fraud during the 2008 Presidential Election, but once again they were cleared of any intentional voter fraud by federal officials.

Here is a second excerpt from John Atlas’s article:

“In less than two years after ACORN’s former ally Barack Obama was elected President, it was subject to a ferocious attack by the right wing of the Republican Party, its allies, and Fox News. In an attempt to defeat Obama, John McCain, during the third presidential debate, defamed ACORN claiming the group, whom he linked to Obama, is “now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country.” 

“For months preceding the 2008 presidential debates, Republican Party and right-wing echo politicians, bloggers, columnists, editorial writers, and TV and radio talk-show hosts led an orchestrated campaign blaming ACORN for widespread voter fraud. During the week of October 6-15, CNN aired 54 segments mentioning allegations that ACORN submitted allegedly false or duplicate voter-registration applications in a number of states.”

“Not one U.S. attorney would find any evidence of an illegal vote cast and counted because of registration by ACORN and those working for it. Using TV ads, accusations by local Republican officials, and the national debate, the McCain campaign took the opportunity to link its opponent to what it called an outlaw leftist group.”

ACORN was an organization that started in the 1970′s, and was arguably considered the nations most effective anti-poverty organization. So why was ACORN the target of this political, right-wing, destruction mission? Because they dared to help minorities, the elderly, and the poor learn about their rights, guide them in the right directions to get the help they needed in regards to housing, housing rights, civil liberties, education, and the lists goes on. They taught many people the importance of becoming a part of the electoral and political process, to uplift the poor rather than disregard them as the dregs of society.

So regardless of the smears and lies disseminated by right-wing think tanks and conservative pundits, this was undoubtedly a political ‘hatchet job’ executed by the right-wing, and unfortunately completed by Congress, including democrats, and President Obama.

When will the democrats have enough balls not to give a damn what the right-wing says about them? Or to actually stand for their principles, rather than capitulate and concede like a bunch of cowering punks? If democrats would sign onto a bill that is unconstitutional, what are we to believe they are going to do when real policy challenges come their way? Particularly because they forfeited the challenge or violated the rights of ACORN, by defunding it unconstitutionally, for political expediency?

The destruction of ACORN was an injustice that many of us don’t seem to understand. Their are many implications about society in this: Political, social, class, and yes, racial. Despite the passing of the Fourteenth Amendment, which avows equal protections under the law, the ugly head of Jim Crow still exists, even in 2012…

Firebrand Central

To read John Atlas’s full article, go to http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-atlas/acorn-closes-its-last-doo_b_778047.html

Here is a video from Democracy Now! with an interview with John Atlas about the ACORN injustice:

 

 

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS