Why the TEA Party owes Andrew Breitbart

Andrew Breitbart speaks at a 'Cut Spending Now' rally at the conservative Americans for Prosperity 'Defending the American Dream Summit.'

On the morning of March 1, 2012, conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart died, at the age of 43, of unexpected natural causes.

That same afternoon, on the floor of Congress, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) payed tribute to Breitbart, in which he refers to as a “marvelous gift” from God. He also claims Breitbart “gave a good dose of chemotherapy to the cancer.”

The “cancer” that Gohmert is referring to was former community organization named the Association of Community Organization for Reform Now, otherwise known as ACORN.

ACORN was dismantled due to a firestorm of political controversy and negative publicity, stemming from a highly-edited videotape that portrays ACORN employees engaging in criminal activity, apparently counseling two conservative activists, James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles, on how to hide prostitution and avoid taxes. James O’ Keefe was an employee of Andrew Breitbart, founder of the website biggovernment.com. ACORN was defunded by Congress and other private donors, and ultimately had to file for chapter 7 bankruptcy and liquidate in 2010.

Congressmen such as Louie Gohmert and Steve King (R-Iowa) express a great debt to Breitbart. Rep. Steve king said, “I wouldn’t be doing this if it weren’t for the influence of Andrew Breitbart. In fact, we might not even know about the threat to the underpinnings of our Constitution … if it hadn’t been for Andrew Breitbart.”

There’s one thing in particular that Gohmert and King have in common: They are members of the TEA Party.

There is overwhelming evidence which shows that the TEA Party owes a lot to Andrew Breitbart. Here is the incident that brought Breitbart to TEA Party greatness.

During the summer of 2010, NAACP president Benjamin Jealous challenged the TEA Party to sign a resolution, asking the TEA Party to “expel the bigots and racists” in their ranks or “take the responsibility for them and their actions.”

The TEA Party responded with counterclaims of racism. The St. Louis TEA Party released its own resolution, while condemning the organization and demanding its “bigoted, false and inflammatory resolution” be withdrawn.

In May of 2010, a Washington Post/ABC News poll suggested that nearly a third of Americans see racism as an underlying current of the TEA Party.

The TEA Party appeared to be losing this fight with the NAACP, until Andrew Breitbart came to its rescue.

On July 19, 2010, Andrew Breitbart releases a video of Shirley Sherrod, who was the  USDA Director of Rural Development for the State of Georgia, on his website biggovernment.com which appeared to show Sherrod admitting discrimination against a white farmer. The video was a two and a half minute clip of a 45 minute speech that Sherrod gave at an NAACP convention, earlier in 2010. The video created a firestorm of controversy and media coverage through major media stations like FOX and CNN, as well as commentary from many right-wing pundits like Rush Limbaugh, Joe Scarborough, Laura Ingraham, and others.

On that same day, Shirley Sherrod was forced to resign by the USDA, but was later vindicated of any wrongdoing and offered a new job, and was offered apologies by USDA and the White House.

In February of 2011, Shirley Sherrod filed a defamation lawsuit against Andrew Breitbart for the misleading video posted on his website that cost Sherrod her job at the USDA.

Here are three reasons why the TEA Party owes Andrew Breitbart so much:

1. Breitbart’s video may have smeared Sherrod and made her a political scapegoat, but it succeeded in laying cover for the TEA Party, in regards to the NAACP and its challenge to the TEA Party to sign their resolution denouncing all of the racist elements in their party. The video fabricated an equalizing narrative that portrayed racism within the NAACP, although it was a false equivalency since it was a mischaracterization of Sherrod’s statements.

2. Breitbart proverbially “took a bullet” for the TEA Party, by opening himself up for a civil suit, where there is a good chance he may lose, even in his passing. Sherrod has continued her lawsuit against his estate.

3. Even though Sherrod was cleared of the charges of racism, Breitbart succeeded in creating such a political circus, and distraction, that the TEA Party escaped the NAACP challenge to a resolution that would have likely exposed the TEA Party, and since the NAACP denounced Sherrod’s statements when Breitbart’s video was first released without researching their own video, the NAACP hurt its own credibility. NAACP president Benjamin Jealous later admitted that they were “snookered” by Breitbart’s video.

In conclusion, the TEA Party certainly owes that conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart for his loyalty and political courage, but the debt is one the TEA Party can easily pay. Just continue protecting the racist element of the TEA Party, even if you have to destroy the lives of the innocent to do so.

Firebrand Central

For a timeline on the Breitbart-Sherrod saga, click the link below:

http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/07/22/timeline-of-breitbarts-sherrod-smear/168090

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

ACORN back in review; ACORN was destroyed unconstitutionally

ACORN

ACORN back in review

As many of  you have already heard, ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) was the community organizing group that was forced to dismantle, due to lack of funds for legal services, in defending the organization against close to 50 state, federal, and local investigations, but worst of all, the ‘Defund ACORN’ Act passed by Congress, and signed into law by President Obama.

The Defund ACORN Act was deemed an unconstitutional “Bill of Attainder.” 

Because of this erroneous act by Congress, ACORN was deemed ‘guilty’ without being convicted of any wrongdoing.

I’m sure many of you are saying, “What about the ACORN video by James O’Keefe with prostitution scandal?” It was later discovered that the videotape was heavily edited; in other words, O’Keefe’s sole purpose was to bring down ACORN with scandal, even if it was all based on a lie!! This is NOT ethical journalism nor should O’Keefe hypocritically speak about truth when he exemplified none in his feeble and bogus attempt to be an investigative reporter.

Here is an excerpt from a Huffington Post article by John Atlas:

“ACORN would have survived the presidential election attacks, but for videotapes of two right wing activists who entered ten of ACORN’s offices, allegedly posing as a pimp and a prostitute. The activists with the help of conservative entrepreneur Andrew Breitbart claimed that the videos proved that ACORN’s staff was incompetent and the group was promoting prostitution.”

“The videos were shown on Fox News and cable around the clock for weeks. Every media outlet picked up the story. When the mainstream media, including the New York Times, verified the Fox tapes as factual, most of ACORN’s financial and political supporters abandoned the group. Congress defunded ACORN, further stigmatizing the group. By the end of 2009, every independent investigation–including the Congressional Research Service, a former Massachusetts Attorney General, a Brooklyn District Attorney and the California Attorney General, exonerated ACORN from all wrong-doing. It turned out the videos were doctored, edited, and misleading. Over 45 federal, state, and local investigations cleared ACORN of wrongdoing, but two investigations–one in Pennsylvania and one in Nevada– continued to drain ACORN’s resources.”

“But the damage to ACORN was done — the group had to dismantle, though Bertha Lewis, ACORN’s CEO, hoped to have a small Washington D.C. presence to give voice to the poor.”

ACORN was also accused of engaging in voter fraud during the 2008 Presidential Election, but once again they were cleared of any intentional voter fraud by federal officials.

Here is a second excerpt from John Atlas’s article:

“In less than two years after ACORN’s former ally Barack Obama was elected President, it was subject to a ferocious attack by the right wing of the Republican Party, its allies, and Fox News. In an attempt to defeat Obama, John McCain, during the third presidential debate, defamed ACORN claiming the group, whom he linked to Obama, is “now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country.” 

“For months preceding the 2008 presidential debates, Republican Party and right-wing echo politicians, bloggers, columnists, editorial writers, and TV and radio talk-show hosts led an orchestrated campaign blaming ACORN for widespread voter fraud. During the week of October 6-15, CNN aired 54 segments mentioning allegations that ACORN submitted allegedly false or duplicate voter-registration applications in a number of states.”

“Not one U.S. attorney would find any evidence of an illegal vote cast and counted because of registration by ACORN and those working for it. Using TV ads, accusations by local Republican officials, and the national debate, the McCain campaign took the opportunity to link its opponent to what it called an outlaw leftist group.”

ACORN was an organization that started in the 1970′s, and was arguably considered the nations most effective anti-poverty organization. So why was ACORN the target of this political, right-wing, destruction mission? Because they dared to help minorities, the elderly, and the poor learn about their rights, guide them in the right directions to get the help they needed in regards to housing, housing rights, civil liberties, education, and the lists goes on. They taught many people the importance of becoming a part of the electoral and political process, to uplift the poor rather than disregard them as the dregs of society.

So regardless of the smears and lies disseminated by right-wing think tanks and conservative pundits, this was undoubtedly a political ‘hatchet job’ executed by the right-wing, and unfortunately completed by Congress, including democrats, and President Obama.

When will the democrats have enough balls not to give a damn what the right-wing says about them? Or to actually stand for their principles, rather than capitulate and concede like a bunch of cowering punks? If democrats would sign onto a bill that is unconstitutional, what are we to believe they are going to do when real policy challenges come their way? Particularly because they forfeited the challenge or violated the rights of ACORN, by defunding it unconstitutionally, for political expediency?

The destruction of ACORN was an injustice that many of us don’t seem to understand. Their are many implications about society in this: Political, social, class, and yes, racial. Despite the passing of the Fourteenth Amendment, which avows equal protections under the law, the ugly head of Jim Crow still exists, even in 2012…

Firebrand Central

To read John Atlas’s full article, go to http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-atlas/acorn-closes-its-last-doo_b_778047.html

Here is a video from Democracy Now! with an interview with John Atlas about the ACORN injustice:

 

 

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS